What's the difference between IRR and NPV?
NPV is the present-dollar value a project adds at your specified discount rate; IRR is the discount rate at which NPV would equal zero. NPV requires you to assume a cost of capital and produces a dollar answer that scales with project size; IRR is dimensionless and easier to compare across deals, but it can be misleading on mutually exclusive projects, projects of different scale, and projects with non-conventional cash flows. When the two methods disagree on ranking, follow NPV.
Is a higher IRR always better?
Not for ranking projects. IRR ignores scale, so a 60% return on $20,000 produces less absolute value than a 22% return on $5 million. IRR also implicitly assumes you can reinvest interim cash flows at the IRR itself, which is rarely realistic for double-digit-plus rates. For independent projects "higher IRR > hurdle" is a fine accept/reject signal; for choosing among competing projects, use NPV (or MIRR with a realistic reinvestment rate).
What's MIRR and when should I use it instead?
Modified IRR (MIRR) computes the rate by compounding positive cash flows forward at an explicit reinvestment rate (usually your cost of capital) and discounting negative cash flows back at a finance rate. The result is a single, well-behaved rate even when standard IRR has multiple solutions or assumes implausible reinvestment. Use MIRR for projects with non-conventional cash flows, very high IRRs that obviously won't be available as reinvestment opportunities, or whenever you need an apples-to-apples comparison across long horizons.
Why does my IRR seem too high to be real?
Two common reasons. First, IRR assumes interim cash is reinvested at the IRR; if your modeled IRR is 45%, that compounding is doing a lot of the lifting and likely won't happen in reality. Second, very short-duration projects with quick payback often produce inflated annualized rates that disappear once you model the actual reinvestment opportunities. Recompute MIRR at your real cost of capital before believing a >30% IRR.
Can IRR be negative?
Yes. A negative IRR means the cash inflows don't cover the initial investment even at a zero discount rate — the project loses nominal dollars. The calculator can return rates as low as roughly -99%. If you see a negative IRR, the project destroys value at any positive cost of capital and should be rejected outright unless there is non-financial strategic justification you can quantify separately.
When does a project have multiple IRRs?
Descartes' rule of signs says a cash-flow series with k sign changes can have up to k positive real IRRs. Projects with one upfront outflow and only positive subsequent flows have at most one IRR. Projects with mid-life capex, reclamation costs, or earn-out structures often have two sign changes and can produce two valid IRR solutions. In those cases neither IRR alone tells the full story — switch to NPV at your cost of capital, or use MIRR.
What about projects with no initial outflow?
If every cash flow is positive (e.g., a grant-funded project with no investor outlay), there is no rate at which NPV = 0 and IRR is undefined. The calculator will reject the inputs because it requires at least one sign change in the cash-flow series. For these situations, NPV at your cost of capital is the right metric — the project is value-creating whenever discounted inflows are positive.
How do I choose the hurdle rate?
Start with the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) — the blended after-tax cost of the firm's debt and equity. Add a risk premium of 2-5 percentage points for projects riskier than the firm's average (new geographies, unproven products), and reduce it for low-risk projects like cost-saving capex in core operations. For private investors, benchmark hurdle rates against expected returns on listed peers in the same risk class.
Is IRR the same as CAGR?
Only in the special case where there are exactly two cash flows: one outflow at time 0 and one inflow at time n. Then IRR = CAGR = (Ending / Beginning)^(1/n) - 1. As soon as you add interim cash flows, IRR diverges from CAGR because it weights each flow by its discount factor. CAGR is the right metric for a buy-and-hold position with a single sale; IRR is the right metric for any cash-flow series in between.
Does this calculator handle uneven cash flows?
Yes. Each cash flow input corresponds to a separate year, and you can enter different positive or negative numbers in any cell. Use + Add Year to extend the projection beyond the default five years for longer-lived assets. The IRR returned reflects the exact cash-flow pattern you entered, not an averaged annuity.
How does the calculator solve for IRR?
It uses bisection. Starting with a rate bracket from -99% to +1000%, it evaluates NPV at the midpoint, narrows the bracket toward the side where NPV changes sign, and iterates up to 1000 times until NPV falls within a 0.0001 tolerance. Bisection is slower than Newton-Raphson but robust — it converges as long as a real IRR exists in the bracket, regardless of the shape of the NPV curve.
What's a reasonable IRR by asset class?
Approximate long-run benchmarks: investment-grade bonds 4-6%, public equities 8-12%, core real estate 8-12%, value-add real estate 12-18%, private-equity buyouts 18-25%, venture capital 25-35% gross (with most deals returning zero). These figures are gross of fees and pre-tax; adjust down for your actual fee load and tax position before treating any of them as a personal hurdle.