Healthy full-service neighborhood restaurant
An owner-operated 90-seat bistro reports $2,000,000 in annual food and beverage sales. COGS is $640,000 (32%), labor is $640,000 (32%), occupancy is $160,000 (8%), and other operating expenses are $260,000. Depreciation on kitchen equipment is $35,000 and amortization on leasehold improvements is $15,000.
ResultGross profit = 2,000,000 - 640,000 = $1,360,000. EBITDA = 1,360,000 - 640,000 - 160,000 - 260,000 = $300,000. EBITDA margin = 300,000 / 2,000,000 = 15.0%.
Note that depreciation and amortization do not subtract from EBITDA — they sit below the line on purpose, which is why the $50,000 of D&A is reported separately. A 15% margin on a full-service independent is on the strong side of the 10-15% benchmark range and would draw acquisition interest at roughly 3-5x EBITDA, implying a $900k-$1.5M enterprise value before any owner-compensation normalization.
Fast-casual concept hitting the higher margin band
A single-unit fast-casual bowl concept generates $1,400,000 in revenue. Food and beverage costs run $420,000 (30%), labor is $364,000 (26% — leaner because of counter service and no tipped servers), occupancy is $98,000 (7%), and other operating expenses are $238,000. Depreciation is $40,000; amortization is $0.
ResultGross profit = $980,000. EBITDA = 980,000 - 364,000 - 98,000 - 238,000 = $280,000. EBITDA margin = 280,000 / 1,400,000 = 20.0%.
A 20% margin is exactly where a well-run fast-casual should land per industry benchmarks (15-22%). Notice prime cost (COGS + labor) is 56% — comfortably under the 60% threshold most operators use as a warning line. Branded fast-casual chains at this margin commonly transact at 6-10x EBITDA in M&A, versus 3-5x for independents.
Struggling casual-dining unit with negative EBITDA
A 150-seat casual-dining restaurant does $1,800,000 in revenue but is bleeding cash. COGS is $612,000 (34%), labor has crept to $702,000 (39% — manager turnover and weekend overtime), occupancy is $216,000 (12% — a lease signed at the top of the market), other operating expenses are $324,000. D&A totals $45,000.
ResultGross profit = $1,188,000. EBITDA = 1,188,000 - 702,000 - 216,000 - 324,000 = -$54,000. EBITDA margin = -3.0%.
Prime cost is 73% — well past the 65% red line — and occupancy is 12%, leaving nothing for the bottom line. Negative EBITDA means the unit is not even covering controllable operating costs before financing or non-cash charges. Standard playbook is to attack labor first (the largest controllable), renegotiate the lease, then look at menu pricing; otherwise the location is a closure candidate and would not transact on an EBITDA multiple at all.